It’s 1:45 AM. You’ve got two hundred pages due by morning, a brain running on fumes and four dollar coffee, not to mention a nagging feeling that this entire course is nothing more than an academic Ponzi scheme.
Good news / bad news time. The bad news is you’re not wrong. There really is a segment within higher education that treats the system the same way they would a for-profit business. The good news is that being right about that changes absolutely nothing about what you have to do next, so you might as well hear me out.
First off, it’s important to remember that “the system is broken” and “why bother” are two completely different sentences. People love to smush them together like they’re the same thought. THEY ARE NOT! The gap between those two statements is where your future sits, waiting to find out how you’re going to navigate the problem. Let’s take a walk through the wreckage first. Then we’ll talk about why you have to keep going despite the mess.
THE RECEIPTS ARE GENUINELY INSANE
Let’s start with the money, because the money tells the verifiable truth where nobody else will.
Americans are sitting on roughly $1.8 trillion in student loan debt spread across about 43 million people, with the average borrower owing somewhere near forty grand. Those aren’t just small numbers proving my point…those are massive numbers indicative of a fucking hostage situation! Entire generations of us signed contracts at eighteen, an age at which most of us couldn’t even be trusted to pick a reasonable phone plan. As a result, we’re now all stuck with debt balances that decide whether we’ll be financially sound enough to buy a house or start a family.
Then there’s the part where they nickel and dime you on the way in AND on the way out. College textbook prices have climbed at more than four times the rate of general inflation since 2006, with single books regularly crossing two hundred dollars and some even clearing four hundred. In 2025 alone the category jumped another 8.6 percent. For what, exactly? A “new edition” where they moved chapter six in front of chapter five, swapped the cover photo, and added an access code that bricks the whole thing the second the semester ends?
The end result is the same across the board. The institution is teaching us its most honest and valuable lesson: You are revenue. No matter where you go in life…you are revenue. Even here…even right now. I want to build things that are rooted in pure, unadulterated altruism, but the same situation that applies to you applies to me as well. Now that doesn’t mean we can’t figure out how to make a broken system better. We CAN, and we will. And, in my opinion, making education more accessible through effective tooling is the best path forward.
THEY HAVE PROOF THE TEACHING IS BROKEN. THEY KEEP DOING IT ANYWAY.
Here’s the part that should actually make you mad. It’s all a choice.
In 2014, a team led by Scott Freeman ran a meta-analysis of 225 studies in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences comparing plain lecturing against “active learning,” which is an unglamorous term for any setup where the student has to actually do something instead of sitting there absorbing a monologue. The results were not subtle. Failure rates under traditional lecturing ran about 34 percent. Under active learning they dropped to roughly 22 percent. Students stuck in lecture halls were one and a half times more likely to flat-out fail the course.
Sit with that. We’ve known, with hard peer-reviewed evidence, for over a decade, that the dominant way college education is taught measurably increases the odds that students will wash out. And the response from most of the higher ed community has been a thoughtful nod followed by absolutely nothing. The guy at the front of the room is still droning through slides he hasn’t updated since the Obama administration, and the peer-reviewed science says that’s costing real students real degrees.
The droning lecture survives because it’s cheap, it’s easy, and it’s tradition, and those things combined can out-muscle the truth for a very long time. This isn’t a knock on every professor. Plenty of them are actively and fervently fighting the same system you are, just from a worse-paid angle than you’d think. But the machine itself doesn’t care that there’s a better way. It has a room, it has a microphone, and it has you, sitting in a chair, already on the hook for the bill.
AND AFTER ALL THAT, A LOT OF PEOPLE DON’T ACTUALLY LEARN MUCH
This is the punchline…but it isn’t funny.
In Academically Adrift, researchers Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa tracked thousands of students and found that a large share showed no statistically significant gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, or writing skills during their first two years of college. Follow them out to four years and roughly 36 percent still showed no meaningful improvement. Academics have argued about the exact percentage ever since (which is itself an extremely academic thing to do) but the uncomfortable shape of the finding has held up: a meaningful chunk of people pay a fortune, sit through the whole thing, walk across the stage, and come out the other side thinking about as sharply as they did going in.
Arum and Roksa do manage to put their finger on “the why”, and it’s bleak in a way that may feel familiar. When you treat students like customers buying a diploma, they start behaving like customers buying a diploma. The goal quietly shifts from “learn the thing” to “acquire the receipt that says I learned the thing, with minimal effort.” Everybody’s incentives line up perfectly, and the actual education becomes the one thing nobody at the table is really fighting for.
So yes. The cost is obscene, the teaching is demonstrably worse than it needs to be, and a serious percentage of graduates don’t get measurably smarter. The system is broken. I’m not going to insult you by pretending otherwise.
SHOULD WE BURN IT DOWN? HELL NO! LEARN ANYWAY.
Here’s the only part of this whole thing that actually matters.
The diploma is just a receipt. The education IS the asset. The tragedy of the broken system is that it makes people confuse the two, chase the receipt, and skip the asset. Don’t do that. The receipt opens some doors, sure. But the thing that determines what you do once you’re through the door is whether you actually learned anything, and that part was never really in anyone else’s control to begin with. It’s in yours. It’s always been in yours. Own it.
Knowledge doesn’t get less real because it was delivered poorly. The Krebs cycle is true whether you learned it from a brilliant mentor or reverse-engineered it from a textbook at 2 a.m. A second language is a second language whether the class was great or whether you taught yourself using a shitty app during your commute. The chemistry final does not care that the lecture sucked. Neither, eventually, will your career, your predilection for curiosity, or the version of you that exists in ten years and either knows things or doesn’t.
The catch is that nobody is coming to save you. The institution had its shot and, statistically, blew it. Which means the move is to stop waiting for the system to teach you and start teaching yourself, using the methods that the research already says will actually work. Active recall instead of passive re-reading. Testing yourself instead of highlighting until the page glows in neon pink. Spacing it out over time instead of cramming it all into one doomed night. This is the exact stuff that the Freeman study found beats sitting in a lecture, and it’s available to anyone willing to haul their own ass through it.
I built a flashcard app, so yeah, this is the spot where you brace for the pitch. I’ll keep it to one sentence: the entire reason I built it is to make that “teach yourself the right way” part take minutes instead of hours, because I figured if the system won’t do its job, the least I could do is hand you better tools for doing it yourself. That’s my whole sales pitch. Take it or leave it, the science underneath it is free and it’s real. The free version of the tool works really well. Upgrade if you want to. Stay on the free tier if you don’t. Just don’t stop studying. Ever.
Despite everything, learn anyway. You’re the one who has to live in the brain you’re building, long after the institution has cashed your checks and forgotten your name. Spite is a perfectly good reason to get smart. Frankly it’s one of the best ones I know.
The exam is still coming. So is the rest of your life. Go learn the thing.
Sources
-
Student debt: Education Data Initiative
-
Textbook prices: Student PIRGs and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI data
-
Lecturing vs. active learning: Freeman et al., PNAS (2014)
-
Learning gains: Arum & Roksa, Academically Adrift (Univ. of Chicago Press, 2011)
-
Photo by Aaron Burden on Unsplash